000 03342nam a22005775i 4500
001 978-3-319-11400-2
003 DE-He213
005 20200421112049.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 141029s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783319114002
_9978-3-319-11400-2
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
_2doi
050 4 _aB67
072 7 _aPDA
_2bicssc
072 7 _aSCI075000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a501
_223
100 1 _aGethmann, C. F.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aInterdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2015.
300 _aXVI, 195 p. 6 illus., 4 illus. in color.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aEthics of Science and Technology Assessment, Schriftenreihe der EA European Academy of Technology and Innovation Assessment GmbH,
_x1860-4803 ;
_v43
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520 _aInterdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650 0 _aPhilosophy.
650 0 _aPhilosophy and science.
650 0 _aEconomic policy.
650 0 _aSociology.
650 1 4 _aPhilosophy.
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy of Science.
650 2 4 _aR & D/Technology Policy.
650 2 4 _aKnowledge - Discourse.
700 1 _aCarrier, M.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aHanekamp, G.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aKaiser, M.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aKamp, G.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aLingner, S.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aQuante, M.
_eauthor.
700 1 _aThiele, F.
_eauthor.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319113999
830 0 _aEthics of Science and Technology Assessment, Schriftenreihe der EA European Academy of Technology and Innovation Assessment GmbH,
_x1860-4803 ;
_v43
856 4 0 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
912 _aZDB-2-ENG
942 _cEBK
999 _c57076
_d57076