000 04033nam a22005535i 4500
001 978-3-030-69695-5
003 DE-He213
005 20220801213754.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210329s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783030696955
_9978-3-030-69695-5
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-030-69695-5
_2doi
050 4 _aT55.4-60.8
072 7 _aTGP
_2bicssc
072 7 _aTEC009060
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aTGP
_2thema
082 0 4 _a670
_223
100 1 _aKamiya, Tiago Yuiti.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_934234
245 1 0 _aEnvironmental and Financial Performance Evaluation in 3D Printing Using MFCA and LCA
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Tiago Yuiti Kamiya, Marcell Mariano Corrêa Maceno, Mariana Kleina.
250 _a1st ed. 2021.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2021.
300 _aVI, 71 p. 45 illus., 39 illus. in color.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology,
_x2191-5318
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Methodology of environmental and financial performance evaluation in 3D printing -- Comparative case study between materials using FDM -- Perspectives and futures applications.
520 _aThis book presents the methodology of environmental and financial performance evaluation in 3D printing processes using the MFCA and LCA. This methodology is divided into 7 main steps, which are: a) identification of the analysis problem (for example, comparison of different types of 3D printer for use in a given purpose, comparison of different printing materials for the same 3D printer technology, among others) and definition of printing parameters; b) definition of the product to be printed; c) preparation of the printing process flow diagram; d) definition or measurement of the lifespan of the printed product; e) data collection for the implementation of the LCA tool (for example, mass and energy balances); f) data collection for the implementation of the MFCA tool (for example, mass balances, energy balances, mass costs, energy costs, labor costs, etc.); and g) comparative assessment of the financial and environmental performance of 3D printing. As a way of exemplifying the application of this methodology, a real case is presented involving the comparison of two types of materials (Polylactic Acid – PLA – and Polyethylene Glycol Polyterephthalate – PETG) used in the 3D printing process by FDM technology. The part printed in this real case was a clearance gauge used as a joint spacing control by an automobile industry located in Brazil. The development of the methodology and consequent application has shown that it can be used by users of 3D printing, in the most diverse areas, to support their decision in choices that can present the best performance, both financial and environmental. .
650 0 _aIndustrial engineering.
_931641
650 0 _aProduction engineering.
_93683
650 0 _aEngineering design.
_93802
650 1 4 _aIndustrial and Production Engineering.
_931644
650 2 4 _aProcess Engineering.
_934235
650 2 4 _aEngineering Design.
_93802
700 1 _aCorrêa Maceno, Marcell Mariano.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_934236
700 1 _aKleina, Mariana.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_934237
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_934238
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030696948
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030696962
830 0 _aSpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology,
_x2191-5318
_934239
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69695-5
912 _aZDB-2-ENG
912 _aZDB-2-SXE
942 _cEBK
999 _c75576
_d75576